offer: be valid in quebec

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.59
, document
Weight: 0.59
, link
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invitation
Weight: 0.60
, bid
Weight: 0.55
, yank
Weight: 0.34
, plan
Weight: 0.32
, recommendation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valid in quebec 1.00
is valid 0.91
contribute quebec 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(proposal, is valid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(offer, be valid in quebec)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(offer, be valid in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(proposal, is valid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(offer, be valid in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(proposal, is valid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(offer, be valid in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(plan, contribute quebec)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(proposal, is valid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(offer, be valid in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(offer, be valid in quebec)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(offer, be valid in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(plan, contribute quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(plan, contribute quebec)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(offer, be valid in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(offer, be valid in quebec)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(offer, be valid in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(offer, be valid in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(offer, be valid in quebec)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(offer, be valid in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(offer, be valid in quebec)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(offer, be valid in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(proposal, is valid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(offer, be valid in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(plan, contribute quebec)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(offer, be valid in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(proposal, is valid)