office worker: has opportunity to advance

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.81
, employee
Weight: 0.74
, people
Weight: 0.64
, professional
Weight: 0.58
, user
Weight: 0.55
Siblings secretary
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.43
, receptionist
Weight: 0.38
, janitor
Weight: 0.38
, nurse
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has opportunity to advance 1.00
desire to advance 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(worker, desire to advance)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(office worker, has opportunity to advance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(office worker, has opportunity to advance)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(worker, desire to advance)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(office worker, has opportunity to advance)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(worker, desire to advance)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(worker, desire to advance)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(office worker, has opportunity to advance)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(office worker, has opportunity to advance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(office worker, has opportunity to advance)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(office worker, has opportunity to advance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(office worker, has opportunity to advance)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(office worker, has opportunity to advance)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(office worker, has opportunity to advance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(office worker, has opportunity to advance)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(office worker, has opportunity to advance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(office worker, has opportunity to advance)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(worker, desire to advance)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(office worker, has opportunity to advance)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(worker, desire to advance)