office worker: sit at desk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.81
, employee
Weight: 0.74
, people
Weight: 0.64
, professional
Weight: 0.58
, user
Weight: 0.55
Siblings secretary
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.43
, receptionist
Weight: 0.38
, janitor
Weight: 0.38
, nurse
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
sit at desk 1.00
be at desk 0.92
sit behind reception desk 0.87
has desk in their office 0.86
be find at reception desk 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(worker, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(office worker, sit at desk)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(professional, has desk in their office)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(office worker, sit at desk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(professional, has desk in their office)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(worker, be at desk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(worker, be at desk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(professional, has desk in their office)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, be at desk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, sit behind reception desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(secretary, be find at reception desk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(worker, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(office worker, sit at desk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(professional, has desk in their office)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(office worker, sit at desk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(secretary, be find at reception desk)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(secretary, be find at reception desk)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(receptionist, sit behind reception desk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(receptionist, sit behind reception desk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(receptionist, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(receptionist, be at desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(office worker, sit at desk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(office worker, sit at desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(worker, be at desk)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(professional, has desk in their office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(receptionist, be at desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(receptionist, sit behind reception desk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(secretary, be find at reception desk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(worker, be at desk)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(office worker, sit at desk)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(professional, has desk in their office)