officer: be called sir

Related concepts

Parents	police officer Weight: 0.88 , employee Weight: 0.68 , other person Weight: 0.63 , official Weight: 0.63
Siblings	warrant officer Weight: 0.77 , vice president Weight: 0.74 , executive Weight: 0.72 , chairman Weight: 0.71 , inspector Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be called sir	1.00
be called mr	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(officer, be called sir) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(warrant officer, be called mr)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(officer, be called sir) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(warrant officer, be called mr) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(warrant officer, be called mr)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(officer, be called sir) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(officer, be called sir)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(officer, be called sir) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(officer, be called sir) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(officer, be called sir)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(officer, be called sir) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(officer, be called sir)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(officer, be called sir) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(warrant officer, be called mr)