officer: drag swords

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.68
, other person
Weight: 0.63
, official
Weight: 0.63
Siblings warrant officer
Weight: 0.77
, vice president
Weight: 0.74
, executive
Weight: 0.72
, chairman
Weight: 0.71
, inspector
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
drag swords 1.00
carry swords 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(officer, drag swords)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(officer, drag swords)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(officer, drag swords)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(officer, carry swords)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(officer, drag swords)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(officer, carry swords)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(officer, drag swords)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(officer, carry swords)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(officer, drag swords)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(officer, carry swords)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(officer, drag swords)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(officer, drag swords)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(officer, drag swords)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(officer, drag swords)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(officer, drag swords)