officer: have pistols

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.68
, other person
Weight: 0.63
, official
Weight: 0.63
Siblings warrant officer
Weight: 0.77
, vice president
Weight: 0.74
, executive
Weight: 0.72
, chairman
Weight: 0.71
, inspector
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
have pistols 1.00
get pistols 0.99
use pistols 0.99
carry pistols 0.96
carry guns 0.84
carry gun 0.81
carry sidearms 0.79
use weapons 0.77
feel about car holsters 0.77
need weapons 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(police officer, use weapons)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(officer, have pistols)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(police officer, carry guns)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(officer, have pistols)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(police officer, carry gun)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(officer, have pistols)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(police officer, carry gun)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(police officer, carry guns)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(police officer, use weapons)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(police officer, carry guns)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(police officer, carry gun)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(police officer, use weapons)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(police officer, carry guns)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(officer, have pistols)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(police officer, use weapons)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(officer, have pistols)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(police officer, carry gun)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(officer, have pistols)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(officer, have pistols)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(officer, carry pistols)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(officer, carry pistols)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(officer, carry pistols)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(officer, carry pistols)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(officer, use pistols)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(officer, have pistols)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(officer, have pistols)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(police officer, carry guns)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(police officer, carry gun)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(police officer, use weapons)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(police officer, carry guns)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(police officer, carry gun)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(officer, have pistols)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(police officer, use weapons)