officer: is commissioned

Related concepts

Parents	police officer Weight: 0.88 , employee Weight: 0.68 , other person Weight: 0.63 , official Weight: 0.63
Siblings	warrant officer Weight: 0.77 , vice president Weight: 0.74 , executive Weight: 0.72 , chairman Weight: 0.71 , inspector Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is commissioned	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(officer, is commissioned) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(warrant officer, is commissioned)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(officer, is commissioned) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(warrant officer, is commissioned) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(warrant officer, is commissioned)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(officer, is commissioned) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(officer, is commissioned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(officer, is commissioned) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(officer, is commissioned) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(officer, is commissioned)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(officer, is commissioned) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(officer, is commissioned)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(officer, is commissioned) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(warrant officer, is commissioned)