officer: shoot kill

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.68
, other person
Weight: 0.63
, official
Weight: 0.63
Siblings warrant officer
Weight: 0.77
, vice president
Weight: 0.74
, executive
Weight: 0.72
, chairman
Weight: 0.71
, inspector
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
shoot kill 1.00
shoot people 0.93
shoot times 0.91
shoot dogs 0.88
shoot many times 0.88
shoot unarmed people 0.84
kill even unarmed 0.80
kill unarmed 0.80
keep killing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(police officer, shoot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(officer, shoot kill)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(police officer, shoot dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(police officer, shoot dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(police officer, shoot dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(officer, shoot kill)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(officer, shoot kill)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(officer, shoot unarmed people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(officer, shoot people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(officer, shoot people)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(officer, shoot unarmed people)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(officer, shoot people)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(officer, shoot kill)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(officer, shoot kill)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(police officer, shoot dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(officer, shoot kill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(police officer, shoot dogs)