officer: write in green ink

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents police officer
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.68
, other person
Weight: 0.63
, official
Weight: 0.63
Siblings warrant officer
Weight: 0.77
, vice president
Weight: 0.74
, executive
Weight: 0.72
, chairman
Weight: 0.71
, inspector
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
write in green ink 1.00
write in ink 0.97
sign with pens 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(official, sign with pens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(officer, write in green ink)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(official, sign with pens)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(official, sign with pens)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(official, sign with pens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(officer, write in green ink)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(officer, write in green ink)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(officer, write in ink)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(officer, write in ink)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(officer, write in ink)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(officer, write in ink)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(officer, write in green ink)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(officer, write in green ink)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(official, sign with pens)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(officer, write in green ink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(official, sign with pens)