ohio: be considered swing state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered swing state 1.00
is swing state 0.97
is swing states 0.92
swing states 0.91
is historic swing state 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(wisconsin, is swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered swing state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is swing state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is swing state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(florida, is swing state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is swing state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(wisconsin, is swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ohio, be considered swing state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(florida, is swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(florida, is swing state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(iowa, is swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(iowa, is swing state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ohio, be considered swing state)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ohio, is swing state)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(ohio, is swing states)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ohio, is swing state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ohio, is swing states)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(ohio, is swing state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(ohio, is swing states)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is swing state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is swing states)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered swing state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered swing state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is swing state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(florida, is swing state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(iowa, is swing state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(ohio, be considered swing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is swing state)