oil company: flare gas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.76
, sector
Weight: 0.72
, corporation
Weight: 0.65
, enterprise
Weight: 0.63
Siblings gas
Weight: 0.77
, chevron
Weight: 0.63
, bp
Weight: 0.62
, software company
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
flare gas 1.00
burn gas in flares 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oil company, flare gas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(company, flare gas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(company, flare gas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(oil company, flare gas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(oil company, flare gas)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(oil company, burn gas in flares)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(oil company, burn gas in flares)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(oil company, burn gas in flares)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(oil company, burn gas in flares)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oil company, flare gas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oil company, flare gas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(company, flare gas)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(oil company, flare gas)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(company, flare gas)