oiler: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.45
, ship
Weight: 0.40
, item
Weight: 0.35
, team
Weight: 0.32
, anyone
Weight: 0.30
Siblings machinist
Weight: 0.31
, construction worker
Weight: 0.31
, cargo ship
Weight: 0.31
, electrician
Weight: 0.31
, cruise ship
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
do bad 0.82
be bad year 0.79
do good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(oiler, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(oiler, do bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(oiler, do bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(oiler, do bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(oiler, do bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(oiler, be bad year)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(oiler, do good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(oiler, do good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(oiler, be bad year)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(oiler, be bad year)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(oiler, do good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(oiler, be bad year)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(oiler, do good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(oiler, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(oiler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oiler, has quality bad)