oklahoma: be in beer drought

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kansas
Weight: 0.63
, school
Weight: 0.60
, north america
Weight: 0.60
, louisiana
Weight: 0.58
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in beer drought 1.00
have beer draught 0.83
have 32 beer 0.83
run out of beer 0.82
be out of beer 0.81
have beer shortage 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(oklahoma, be in beer drought)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, run out of beer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(oklahoma, run out of beer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, run out of beer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have 32 beer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have 32 beer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(oklahoma, have 32 beer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(oklahoma, run out of beer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have beer shortage)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(oklahoma, have beer shortage)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(oklahoma, be out of beer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, be out of beer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have 32 beer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have beer shortage)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(oklahoma, be out of beer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(oklahoma, have beer draught)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have beer draught)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have beer draught)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have beer draught)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have beer shortage)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, be out of beer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, be in beer drought)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oklahoma, be in beer drought)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(oklahoma, be in beer drought)