oklahoma: have counties

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kansas
Weight: 0.63
, school
Weight: 0.60
, north america
Weight: 0.60
, louisiana
Weight: 0.58
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have counties 1.00
have dry counties 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(louisiana, have counties)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have counties)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(louisiana, have counties)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, have counties)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(louisiana, have counties)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have counties)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(oklahoma, have counties)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have dry counties)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(oklahoma, have dry counties)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have dry counties)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have dry counties)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have counties)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have counties)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, have counties)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(oklahoma, have counties)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, have counties)