old person: be less athletic than young person

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.67
, child
Weight: 0.53
, case
Weight: 0.50
Siblings other person
Weight: 0.39
, elderly person
Weight: 0.39
, dead person
Weight: 0.39
, young person
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less athletic than young person 1.00
be young 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(child, be young) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(old person, be less athletic than young person)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(child, be young)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(child, be young)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(child, be young) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(old person, be less athletic than young person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(old person, be less athletic than young person)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(old person, be young)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(old person, be young)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(old person, be young)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(old person, be young)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(old person, be less athletic than young person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(old person, be less athletic than young person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(child, be young)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(old person, be less athletic than young person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(child, be young)