old person: be treated days

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.67
, child
Weight: 0.53
, case
Weight: 0.50
Siblings one person
Weight: 0.40
, elderly person
Weight: 0.39
, dead person
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be treated days 1.00
were treated in 1930s 0.89
be treated across world 0.79
be treated in china 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(old person, be treated days)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(old person, were treated in 1930s)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(old person, were treated in 1930s)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(old person, were treated in 1930s)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(old person, be treated across world)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(old person, be treated across world)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(old person, be treated in china)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(old person, be treated across world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(old person, be treated in china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(old person, be treated in china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(old person, were treated in 1930s)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(old person, be treated in china)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(old person, be treated across world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(old person, be treated days)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(old person, be treated days)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(old person, be treated days)