oligopoly: has state monopoly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.52
, competition
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.33
, firm
Weight: 0.28
, monopoly
Weight: 0.24
Siblings banking industry
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.30
, petroleum
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state monopoly 1.00
be better than monopoly 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(competition, be better than monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(oligopoly, has state monopoly)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(competition, be better than monopoly)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(competition, be better than monopoly)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(competition, be better than monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, has state monopoly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(oligopoly, has state monopoly)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oligopoly, be better than monopoly)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, be better than monopoly)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(oligopoly, be better than monopoly)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be better than monopoly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, has state monopoly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(oligopoly, has state monopoly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(competition, be better than monopoly)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(oligopoly, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(competition, be better than monopoly)