onion: burn

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shallot
Weight: 0.55
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, eggplant
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
burn 1.00
burn eyes 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(food, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(onion, burn)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(food, burn)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(food, burn)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(food, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(onion, burn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(onion, burn)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(onion, burn eyes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(onion, burn eyes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(onion, burn eyes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(onion, burn eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(onion, burn)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(onion, burn)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(food, burn)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(onion, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(food, burn)