ontario: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents province
Weight: 0.66
, toronto
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.56
, region
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alberta
Weight: 0.37
, quebec
Weight: 0.35
, ottawa
Weight: 0.34
, montreal
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
be best place live 0.84
has quality good 0.76
be great place work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(toronto, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(ontario, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(toronto, be best place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(toronto, be best place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is best)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(quebec, be best place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, be best place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(montreal, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(toronto, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ontario, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ottawa, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(ottawa, is best)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ottawa, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(ottawa, be best place live)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(quebec, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(quebec, be best place live)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(montreal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(montreal, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(ontario, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(ontario, be best place live)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ontario, be best place live)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(ontario, be best place live)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ontario, be best place live)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ontario, be great place work)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(ontario, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(toronto, be best place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ottawa, is best)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ottawa, be best place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(montreal, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(quebec, be best place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(ontario, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(toronto, be best place live)