ontology: is relevant

Related concepts

Parents	technology Weight: 0.59 , knowledge Weight: 0.58 , structure Weight: 0.52 , language Weight: 0.50 , approach Weight: 0.50
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.33 , synthesis Weight: 0.33 , social engineering Weight: 0.32 , architecture Weight: 0.32 , programming language Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is relevant	1.00
is useful	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(approach, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(ontology, is relevant)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(knowledge, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(ontology, is relevant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(knowledge, is useful)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(approach, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(approach, is useful)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(knowledge, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(computer science, is relevant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(approach, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(ontology, is relevant)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(knowledge, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(ontology, is relevant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(computer science, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(computer science, is relevant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(ontology, is relevant)

Similarity expansion

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(ontology, is useful)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(ontology, is useful)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(ontology, is useful)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(ontology, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(ontology, is relevant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(ontology, is relevant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(knowledge, is useful)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(approach, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(computer science, is relevant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(knowledge, is useful)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(ontology, is relevant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(approach, is useful)