opal: is countertops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gem
Weight: 0.72
, stone
Weight: 0.59
, mineral
Weight: 0.49
, jewelry
Weight: 0.42
Siblings ruby
Weight: 0.37
, sapphire
Weight: 0.36
, amethyst
Weight: 0.35
, aquamarine
Weight: 0.35
, topaz
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is countertops 1.00
is quartz countertops 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(topaz, is countertops)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(topaz, is quartz countertops)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(topaz, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(topaz, is countertops)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(topaz, is quartz countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(topaz, is quartz countertops)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(opal, is countertops)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(opal, is quartz countertops)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(opal, is quartz countertops)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(opal, is quartz countertops)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(opal, is quartz countertops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(opal, is countertops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(opal, is countertops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(topaz, is countertops)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(opal, is countertops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(topaz, is quartz countertops)