operation: have names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, functional group
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.73
, raid
Weight: 0.72
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, distribution
Weight: 0.66
, business activity
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have names 1.00
change names 0.92
have cool names 0.88
get name 0.85
get name new 0.83
names of are brackets 0.81
names of are brackets on street signs 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(place, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(operation, have names)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(place, names of are brackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(operation, have names)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(place, names of are brackets on street signs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(operation, have names)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(place, have names)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(place, names of are brackets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(place, names of are brackets on street signs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(place, names of are brackets on street signs)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(place, names of are brackets)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(place, have names)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(place, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(operation, have names)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(place, names of are brackets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(operation, have names)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(place, names of are brackets on street signs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(operation, have names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(operation, have names)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(operation, have cool names)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(operation, have cool names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(operation, have cool names)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(operation, have cool names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(operation, have names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(operation, have names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(place, have names)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(place, names of are brackets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(place, names of are brackets on street signs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(place, have names)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(place, names of are brackets)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(operation, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(place, names of are brackets on street signs)