operation: is idempotent

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, functional group
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.73
, raid
Weight: 0.72
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, distribution
Weight: 0.66
, business activity
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is pre-dawn 1.00
is zong 1.00
is inbalanced 1.00
is cancelled 1.00
is idempotent 1.00
is yosemite 1.00
is on 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is yosemite)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(raid, is pre-dawn)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is zong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(distribution, is on)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(operating system, is yosemite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(operating system, is yosemite)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(raid, is pre-dawn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(raid, is pre-dawn)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(operating system, is zong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(operating system, is zong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(distribution, is on) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(distribution, is on)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(operation, is idempotent)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(operation, is inbalanced)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(operation, is cancelled)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(operation, is cancelled)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(operation, is inbalanced)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(operation, is cancelled)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(operation, is cancelled)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(operation, is inbalanced)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(operation, is inbalanced)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(operation, is idempotent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(operation, is idempotent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(operating system, is yosemite)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(distribution, is on)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(raid, is pre-dawn)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(operation, is idempotent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(operating system, is zong)