operation: is southern storm

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, functional group
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.73
, raid
Weight: 0.72
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, distribution
Weight: 0.66
, business activity
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is southern storm 1.00
has state storm 0.92
is southern storm failing 0.91
is storm failing 0.82
be on hills unsafe during thunderstorm 0.77
be in coastal areas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(place, be in coastal areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, is southern storm)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(place, be in coastal areas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(place, be in coastal areas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(place, be in coastal areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(operation, is southern storm)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(operation, is southern storm)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(operation, is southern storm failing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(operation, is southern storm failing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(operation, has state storm)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(operation, has state storm)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(operation, is southern storm failing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(operation, has state storm)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(operation, is storm failing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(operation, is southern storm failing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(operation, is storm failing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(operation, is storm failing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(operation, has state storm)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(operation, is storm failing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operation, is southern storm)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, is southern storm)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(place, be in coastal areas)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(operation, is southern storm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(place, be in coastal areas)