operation: is strategy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, functional group
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.73
, raid
Weight: 0.72
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, distribution
Weight: 0.66
, business activity
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is strategy 1.00
strategy 1.00
apply to marketing strategy 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(concept, apply to marketing strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(operation, is strategy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(operation, is strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(concept, apply to marketing strategy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(operation, is strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(concept, apply to marketing strategy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(operation, is strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(distribution, strategy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(concept, apply to marketing strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(operation, is strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(operation, is strategy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(operation, is strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(distribution, strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(distribution, strategy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(operation, is strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(operation, is strategy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(operation, is strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(operation, is strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(operation, is strategy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(operation, is strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(operation, is strategy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(operation, is strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(concept, apply to marketing strategy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(operation, is strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(distribution, strategy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(operation, is strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(concept, apply to marketing strategy)