operation: using ram

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, functional group
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.73
, raid
Weight: 0.72
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, distribution
Weight: 0.66
, business activity
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
using ram 1.00
require amount of ram 0.85
require certain amount of ram 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(operation, using ram)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(operating system, require amount of ram)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(operation, using ram)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(operating system, require certain amount of ram)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(operation, using ram)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(operating system, require amount of ram)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(operating system, require amount of ram)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(operation, using ram)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(operating system, require certain amount of ram)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(operating system, require certain amount of ram)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(operation, using ram)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(operation, using ram)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(operation, using ram)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(operation, using ram)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(operation, using ram)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(operation, using ram)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(operation, using ram)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(operation, using ram)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(operating system, require amount of ram)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(operation, using ram)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(operating system, require certain amount of ram)