operation: was rolling thunder important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, functional group
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.73
, raid
Weight: 0.72
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, distribution
Weight: 0.66
, business activity
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
was rolling thunder important 1.00
was rolling thunder 0.99
was rolling thunder called 0.98
was rolling thunder launched 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(operation, was rolling thunder important)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(operation, was rolling thunder)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(operation, was rolling thunder called)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(operation, was rolling thunder)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(operation, was rolling thunder)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(operation, was rolling thunder called)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(operation, was rolling thunder called)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(operation, was rolling thunder launched)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(operation, was rolling thunder launched)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(operation, was rolling thunder launched)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(operation, was rolling thunder)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(operation, was rolling thunder launched)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(operation, was rolling thunder called)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(operation, was rolling thunder important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(operation, was rolling thunder important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(operation, was rolling thunder important)