operation: work

Related concepts

Parents	facility Weight: 0.62 , functional group Weight: 0.61 , place Weight: 0.60 , concept Weight: 0.60
Siblings	operating system Weight: 0.73 , raid Weight: 0.72 , extraction Weight: 0.66 , distribution Weight: 0.66 , business activity Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
work	1.00
work in wod	0.98
is work	0.98
be in hasla work	0.96
go work	0.91
works in wod	0.79
work number	0.79
work number of people	0.77
work in terms	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(raid, go work)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(raid, be in hasla work)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(raid, work in wod)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(raid, work number of people)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(raid, works in wod)

...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(extraction, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(extraction, work)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(raid, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(raid, work)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(distribution, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(distribution, work)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(raid, work in wod) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(raid, work in wod)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(raid, go work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(raid, go work)

...

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(operation, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(operation, work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(operation, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(extraction, work)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(distribution, work)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(raid, work)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(raid, work in terms)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(operation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(raid, go work)

...