operator: have sights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.70
, employee
Weight: 0.66
, service
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
Siblings defendant
Weight: 0.59
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.36
, service station
Weight: 0.35
, baa
Weight: 0.35
, software company
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sights 1.00
have different sights 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(operator, have sights)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(operator, have sights)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(operator, have sights)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(operator, have different sights)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(operator, have sights)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(operator, have different sights)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(operator, have sights)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(operator, have different sights)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(operator, have sights)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(operator, have different sights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(operator, have sights)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(operator, have sights)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(operator, have sights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(operator, have sights)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(operator, have sights)