operator: looks ugly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.70
, employee
Weight: 0.66
, service
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
Siblings defendant
Weight: 0.59
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.36
, service station
Weight: 0.35
, baa
Weight: 0.35
, software company
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
looks ugly 1.00
looks damn ugly 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(operator, looks ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(operator, looks ugly)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(operator, looks ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(operator, looks damn ugly)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(operator, looks ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(operator, looks damn ugly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(operator, looks ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(operator, looks damn ugly)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(operator, looks ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(operator, looks damn ugly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(operator, looks ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(operator, looks ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(operator, looks ugly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(operator, looks ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(operator, looks ugly)