opportunity: is issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents privilege
Weight: 0.65
, example
Weight: 0.64
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings moment
Weight: 0.65
, challenge
Weight: 0.65
, avenue
Weight: 0.64
, advantage
Weight: 0.64
, happy hour
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is issue 1.00
has state problem 0.78
matter 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(opportunity, is issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(privilege, matter)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(opportunity, is issue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(privilege, matter)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(privilege, matter)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(advantage, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(moment, matter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(opportunity, is issue)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(privilege, matter)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(opportunity, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(moment, matter)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(moment, matter)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(advantage, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(advantage, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(opportunity, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, is issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(opportunity, is issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(privilege, matter)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(moment, matter)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(advantage, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(privilege, matter)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(opportunity, is issue)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)