ops: t for ds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents point
Weight: 0.16
Siblings miami
Weight: 0.18
, node
Weight: 0.17
, capcom
Weight: 0.17
, correction
Weight: 0.17
, control tower
Weight: 0.17

Related properties

Property Similarity
t for ds 1.00
be rated t for ds 0.96
be on ds 0.94
be 16 on nintendo ds 0.88
is js 0.80
work for ty montgomery 0.80
be with sam adhikari 0.80
is js important 0.79
is js bad 0.79
is js good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(node, is js bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(node, is js good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(node, is js important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(node, is js)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(node, is js) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(node, is js)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(node, is js important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(node, is js important)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(node, is js good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(node, is js good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(node, is js bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(node, is js bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ops, t for ds)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ops, be on ds)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(ops, be on ds)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(ops, be rated t for ds)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(ops, be on ds)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ops, be 16 on nintendo ds)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ops, be rated t for ds)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ops, be 16 on nintendo ds)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ops, be 16 on nintendo ds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ops, be rated t for ds)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ops, be 16 on nintendo ds)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ops, be rated t for ds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(ops, be with sam adhikari)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ops, be with sam adhikari)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ops, be with sam adhikari)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ops, be with sam adhikari)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ops, be on ds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ops, t for ds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ops, t for ds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(node, is js)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(node, is js bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(node, is js good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ops, t for ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(node, is js important)