optic: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents signal
Weight: 0.41
, lens
Weight: 0.38
, accessory
Weight: 0.37
, beam
Weight: 0.16
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.30
, camera lens
Weight: 0.29
, traffic light
Weight: 0.28
, magnifying glass
Weight: 0.28
, turn signal
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
be quality 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lens, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(optic, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lens, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(optic, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(beam, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(optic, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beam, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(optic, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(beam, be quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(optic, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(beam, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(optic, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(beam, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(beam, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(lens, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(beam, be quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(beam, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lens, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(beam, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lens, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(lens, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(beam, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(beam, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(beam, be quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(turn signal, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(traffic light, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(lens, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(optic, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lens, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(optic, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(beam, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(optic, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beam, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(optic, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(beam, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(optic, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(beam, be quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(optic, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(traffic light, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(traffic light, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(turn signal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(turn signal, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(optic, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(optic, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(beam, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(beam, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(beam, be quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lens, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(beam, is quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lens, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(traffic light, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(turn signal, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(beam, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lens, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(beam, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lens, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(beam, be quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(optic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(beam, is quality)