optic: improve

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents signal
Weight: 0.41
, lens
Weight: 0.38
, accessory
Weight: 0.37
, beam
Weight: 0.16
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.30
, camera lens
Weight: 0.29
, traffic light
Weight: 0.28
, magnifying glass
Weight: 0.28
, turn signal
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve 1.00
improve night vision 0.83
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(lens, improve night vision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(optic, improve)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lens, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(optic, improve)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(lens, improve night vision)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lens, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lens, improve night vision)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(lens, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(lens, improve night vision) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(optic, improve)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lens, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(optic, improve)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(optic, improve)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(optic, improve)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(optic, improve)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(lens, improve night vision)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lens, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(lens, improve night vision)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(optic, improve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lens, has quality better)