optical fiber: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fiber
Weight: 0.76
, substrate
Weight: 0.72
, light source
Weight: 0.66
, structure
Weight: 0.65
Siblings amplifier
Weight: 0.64
, silicon
Weight: 0.36
, nylon
Weight: 0.35
, polymer
Weight: 0.35
, filament
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(filament, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(nylon, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(nylon, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(nylon, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(filament, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(filament, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(amplifier, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(amplifier, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(optical fiber, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(optical fiber, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(filament, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nylon, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(amplifier, is expensive)