order: was 9066 constitutional

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injunction
Weight: 0.64
, agreement
Weight: 0.61
, protection
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
Siblings will
Weight: 0.60
, warrant
Weight: 0.59
, duty
Weight: 0.58
, writ
Weight: 0.58
, reservation
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
was 9066 constitutional 1.00
be part of constitution 0.86
is unconstitutional 0.79
be part of indian constitution 0.75
be important part of democracy 0.75
be legal 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(protection, be important part of democracy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(order, was 9066 constitutional)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(protection, be important part of democracy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(protection, be important part of democracy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(duty, be part of indian constitution)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be legal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(writ, is unconstitutional)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(protection, be important part of democracy)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(order, was 9066 constitutional)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(writ, is unconstitutional)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(writ, is unconstitutional)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(reservation, be legal)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(reservation, be legal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(duty, be part of indian constitution)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(duty, be part of indian constitution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(order, was 9066 constitutional)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, was 9066 constitutional)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(order, was 9066 constitutional)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(protection, be important part of democracy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(writ, is unconstitutional)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(reservation, be legal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(duty, be part of indian constitution)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(order, was 9066 constitutional)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(protection, be important part of democracy)