order: was important 9066

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injunction
Weight: 0.64
, agreement
Weight: 0.61
, protection
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
Siblings will
Weight: 0.60
, warrant
Weight: 0.59
, duty
Weight: 0.58
, writ
Weight: 0.58
, reservation
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important 9066 1.00
be important 29 0.91
be important in life 0.81
is zephyro 0.79
is short-lived 0.79
is run-down 0.79
is xanterra 0.79
is yachika 0.79
be important in system 0.79
be important in real life 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third party, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(order, was important 9066)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(protection, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(order, was important 9066)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(third party, is short-lived)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(order, was important 9066)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(third party, is short-lived)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(protection, be important in system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(third party, be important in system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(third party, is short-lived)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(protection, be important in system)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(third party, be important in system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(reservation, is xanterra)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(warrant, is zephyro)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(reservation, is run-down)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(writ, is yachika)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third party, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(order, was important 9066)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(protection, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(order, was important 9066)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(third party, is short-lived)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(order, was important 9066)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(writ, is yachika)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(writ, is yachika)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(reservation, is run-down)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(reservation, is run-down)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(reservation, is xanterra)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(reservation, is xanterra)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(warrant, is zephyro)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(warrant, is zephyro)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(order, was important 9066)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(order, be important 29)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(order, be important 29)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(order, be important 29)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(order, be important in life)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(order, be important in life)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(order, be important in real life)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(order, be important in life)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(order, be important in real life)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(order, be important in real life)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(order, be important 29)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(order, be important in real life)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(order, be important in life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(order, was important 9066)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(protection, be important in system)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(third party, be important in system)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(third party, is short-lived)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(writ, is yachika)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(reservation, is run-down)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(reservation, is xanterra)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(warrant, is zephyro)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(protection, be important in system)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(third party, is short-lived)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(order, was important 9066)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(third party, be important in system)