order: was upheld

Related concepts

Parents	injunction Weight: 0.64 , agreement Weight: 0.61 , protection Weight: 0.60 , third party Weight: 0.60
Siblings	will Weight: 0.60 , warrant Weight: 0.59 , duty Weight: 0.58 , writ Weight: 0.58 , reservation Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was upheld	1.00
get invalidated by court	0.79
be rescinded	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(agreement, be rescinded) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(order, was upheld)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(order, was upheld) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(agreement, be rescinded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(order, was upheld) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(agreement, be rescinded)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(order, was upheld) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(will, get invalidated by court)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(agreement, be rescinded) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(order, was upheld) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(order, was upheld)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(order, was upheld) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(will, get invalidated by court) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(will, get invalidated by court)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(order, was upheld) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(order, was upheld)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(order, was upheld) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(order, was upheld) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(order, was upheld)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(order, was upheld) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(order, was upheld)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(order, was upheld) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(agreement, be rescinded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(order, was upheld) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(will, get invalidated by court)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(order, was upheld) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(agreement, be rescinded)