ordinal number: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents number
Weight: 0.77
, concept
Weight: 0.60
, set
Weight: 0.48
Siblings imaginary number
Weight: 0.39
, magic number
Weight: 0.38
, irrational number
Weight: 0.38
, complex number
Weight: 0.37
, rational number
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality better 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(magic number, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(imaginary number, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(magic number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(magic number, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(imaginary number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(imaginary number, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ordinal number, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ordinal number, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ordinal number, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ordinal number, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ordinal number, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ordinal number, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ordinal number, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(magic number, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ordinal number, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(imaginary number, has quality bad)