ordinance: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.68
, rule
Weight: 0.63
, property
Weight: 0.62
, document
Weight: 0.61
Siblings municipality
Weight: 0.66
, supper
Weight: 0.53
, prohibition
Weight: 0.36
, common law
Weight: 0.35
, amendment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(supper, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(supper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(supper, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amendment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(common law, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(ordinance, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(ordinance, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(supper, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(common law, has quality good)