oregon: have seven electoral votes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents region
Weight: 0.59
, program
Weight: 0.59
, california
Weight: 0.57
, state
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.60
, florida
Weight: 0.35
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34
, alaska
Weight: 0.34
, missouri
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have seven electoral votes 1.00
have three electoral votes 0.99
have seven votes 0.92
have three votes 0.92
vote 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(missouri, vote)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(missouri, vote)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(missouri, vote)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(oregon, have seven electoral votes)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(oregon, have three electoral votes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(oregon, have three electoral votes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(oregon, have three electoral votes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(oregon, have three votes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(oregon, have seven votes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(oregon, have three votes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(oregon, have seven votes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(oregon, have three votes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(oregon, vote)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(oregon, vote)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(oregon, have seven votes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(oregon, vote)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(oregon, have seven votes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(oregon, have three votes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(oregon, have three electoral votes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(oregon, vote)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(oregon, have seven electoral votes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(oregon, have seven electoral votes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(oregon, have seven electoral votes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(missouri, vote)