organ: related body systems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.74
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.66
, body part
Weight: 0.61
, organization
Weight: 0.60
Siblings reproductive organ
Weight: 0.83
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.70
, pineal gland
Weight: 0.69
, blood vessel
Weight: 0.68
, large intestine
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
related body systems 1.00
be related to system 0.89
related organ systems 0.87
part of body system 0.87
work with systems 0.85
work with other systems 0.85
part of same body system 0.85
need systems 0.84
has quality systems 0.82
use information systems 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(bone marrow, be related to system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(blood vessel, work with other systems)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(blood vessel, work with other systems)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(blood vessel, work with other systems)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(bone marrow, be related to system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bone marrow, be related to system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(organ, related body systems)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(organ, work with other systems)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(organ, work with other systems)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(organ, work with other systems)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(organ, work with other systems)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(organ, part of same body system)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(organ, related organ systems)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(organ, part of same body system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(organ, part of same body system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(organ, part of same body system)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(organ, related organ systems)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(organ, related organ systems)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(organ, related organ systems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(organ, related body systems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(organ, related body systems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(blood vessel, work with other systems)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(organ, related body systems)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bone marrow, be related to system)