organelle: has physical part structures

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cell membrane
Weight: 0.75
, structure
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.56
, cargo
Weight: 0.49
Siblings lysosome
Weight: 0.70
, cell wall
Weight: 0.66
, ribosome
Weight: 0.63
, nucleus
Weight: 0.61
, nucleolus
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part structures 1.00
have different structures 0.90
has physical part areas 0.85
has physical part layers 0.82
is rigid structure 0.79
differ from cell structures 0.79
differ from other cell structures 0.79
differ from cell structures found 0.78
has physical part zone 0.78
differ from other cell structures found 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, is rigid structure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(cell wall, is rigid structure)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cell wall, is rigid structure)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(organelle, has physical part structures)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(organelle, have different structures)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(organelle, have different structures)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(organelle, has physical part zone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(organelle, have different structures)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(organelle, have different structures)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(organelle, has physical part zone)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(organelle, has physical part zone)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(organelle, has physical part zone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(organelle, has physical part structures)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(organelle, has physical part structures)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(organelle, has physical part structures)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cell wall, is rigid structure)