orientation: is required for e-payment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, variable
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
Siblings socialization
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, alignment
Weight: 0.33
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33
, camp
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is required for e-payment 1.00
is required 0.99
is necessary 0.84
is needed 0.83
be necessary for child 0.78
be allowed use 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(variable, is needed)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(orientation, is required for e-payment)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(factor, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(orientation, is required for e-payment)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(program, be allowed use)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(orientation, is required for e-payment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(factor, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(variable, is needed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(program, be allowed use)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(variable, is needed)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(program, be allowed use)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(factor, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(socialization, be necessary for child)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(business activity, is needed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(socialization, is necessary)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(socialization, is needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(variable, is needed)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(factor, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(program, be allowed use)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(socialization, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(socialization, is necessary)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(socialization, is needed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(socialization, is needed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(business activity, is needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(business activity, is needed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(socialization, be necessary for child)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(socialization, be necessary for child)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(orientation, is required for e-payment)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(orientation, is required)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(orientation, is required)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(orientation, is required)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(orientation, is required for e-payment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, is necessary)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(program, be allowed use)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(variable, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(socialization, is necessary)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(business activity, is needed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(socialization, is needed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(socialization, be necessary for child)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, is necessary)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(variable, is needed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(orientation, is required for e-payment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(program, be allowed use)