oval: is ideal facial shape

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents form
Weight: 0.59
, shape
Weight: 0.59
, cross section
Weight: 0.53
, design
Weight: 0.49
, configuration
Weight: 0.48
Siblings trapezoid
Weight: 0.32
, circle
Weight: 0.31
, hourglass
Weight: 0.31
, hexagon
Weight: 0.31
, rectangle
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is ideal facial shape 1.00
is facial shape 0.93
is ideal face shape 0.89
is ideal shape 0.88
is perfect face shape 0.85
is face ideal 0.83
is best shape 0.78
is face shape 0.78
is shape 0.78
is perfect 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(circle, is perfect)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circle, is best shape)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hexagon, is shape)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(rectangle, is shape)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(circle, is shape)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(rectangle, is shape)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(rectangle, is shape)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(circle, is shape)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(circle, is shape)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hexagon, is shape)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hexagon, is shape)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(circle, is best shape)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(circle, is best shape)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(circle, is perfect)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circle, is perfect)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(oval, is ideal facial shape)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(oval, is facial shape)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(oval, is facial shape)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(oval, is facial shape)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(oval, is perfect face shape)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(oval, is ideal face shape)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(oval, is ideal facial shape)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(oval, is ideal facial shape)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(rectangle, is shape)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(circle, is shape)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(hexagon, is shape)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circle, is best shape)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(oval, is ideal facial shape)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circle, is perfect)