oven: be good for cooking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents household appliance
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.56
Siblings microwave oven
Weight: 0.73
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.36
, frying pan
Weight: 0.36
, fridge
Weight: 0.35
, stove
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for cooking 1.00
be different in cooking food 0.93
cook food 0.86
cook slow 0.83
be different in food 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, cook food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stove, cook food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(microwave oven, cook food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, cook food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(stove, cook food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stove, cook food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(oven, be good for cooking)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(oven, be different in cooking food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(oven, cook food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(oven, cook food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(oven, be different in cooking food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(oven, cook food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(oven, be different in cooking food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(oven, cook slow)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(oven, cook slow)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(oven, cook slow)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(oven, be different in cooking food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(oven, be different in food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(oven, cook slow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(oven, be different in food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(oven, be different in food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(oven, be different in food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(oven, cook food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oven, be good for cooking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(oven, be good for cooking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(microwave oven, cook food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oven, be good for cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(stove, cook food)