overpopulation: be in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in india 1.00
be problem in india 0.92
be in india problem 0.92
be problem for india 0.91
be in pakistan 0.85
is usa 0.84
be high in pakistan 0.84
be in egypt affect america 0.83
be in australia 0.82
is uk 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(problem, be in egypt affect america)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in india)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(issue, be in australia)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(problem, be in egypt affect america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in australia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in egypt affect america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be high in pakistan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is usa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(thyroid problem, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(problem, be in egypt affect america)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(illiteracy, be in india)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be in india)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(illiteracy, be high in pakistan)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be high in pakistan)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(illiteracy, is usa)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is usa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be problem in india)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(thyroid problem, is uk)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(thyroid problem, is uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in india)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in pakistan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in pakistan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in pakistan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in india problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in india)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in india)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem for india)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in india problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in pakistan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in india)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in india problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem for india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem for india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem for india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(problem, be in egypt affect america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be problem in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is usa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be high in pakistan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(thyroid problem, is uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(overpopulation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(problem, be in egypt affect america)