overpopulation: be problem in africa

Related concepts

Parents	issue Weight: 0.66 , crisis Weight: 0.65 , problem Weight: 0.65 , topic Weight: 0.65 , factor Weight: 0.62
Siblings	thyroid problem Weight: 0.35 , inequality Weight: 0.34 , mental health problem Weight: 0.34 , desertification Weight: 0.33 , illiteracy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be problem in africa	1.00
be in africa	0.92
happen in africa	0.90
be problem in america	0.89
be in south africa	0.88
occur in africa	0.88
be problem in india	0.87
be in india problem	0.87
be problem for india	0.87
be such problem in america	0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(desertification, be in africa)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(desertification, happen in africa)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in america)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(desertification, occur in africa)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(desertification, be in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(desertification, be in africa)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(desertification, happen in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(desertification, happen in africa)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(desertification, occur in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(desertification, occur in africa)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be problem in america)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be problem in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in africa)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in africa)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in africa)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in africa)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india problem)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in india problem)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in india)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in india)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem for india)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in india problem)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in india)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in india)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem for india)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in india problem)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem for india)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem for india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(desertification, be in africa)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(desertification, happen in africa)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(desertification, occur in africa)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(illiteracy, be problem in america)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(illiteracy, be problem in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)