oyster: be good for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seafood
Weight: 0.66
, mollusk
Weight: 0.66
, shellfish
Weight: 0.62
, crustacean
Weight: 0.54
, product
Weight: 0.53
Siblings shrimp
Weight: 0.38
, crab
Weight: 0.37
, lobster
Weight: 0.36
, scallop
Weight: 0.36
, mussel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for environment 1.00
has quality good 0.80
be good for guys 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(seafood, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(oyster, be good for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(seafood, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(seafood, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(scallop, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(seafood, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(oyster, be good for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(scallop, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(scallop, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(shrimp, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(shrimp, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(oyster, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(oyster, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(oyster, be good for guys)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(oyster, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(oyster, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(oyster, be good for guys)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(oyster, be good for guys)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(oyster, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(oyster, be good for guys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(oyster, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(oyster, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(seafood, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(scallop, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrimp, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(oyster, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(seafood, has quality good)