pacemaker: fail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, device
Weight: 0.65
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.58
, defibrillator
Weight: 0.57
Siblings implant
Weight: 0.36
, artificial heart
Weight: 0.35
, network device
Weight: 0.35
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.35
, stent
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail 1.00
fail part i 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(implant, fail)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(stent, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(implant, fail part i)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(implant, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(implant, fail)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(stent, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(stent, fail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(implant, fail part i) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(implant, fail part i)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(pacemaker, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, fail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pacemaker, fail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(implant, fail)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(stent, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(implant, fail part i)